McDermott Will & Emery (Brussels)

Hendrik Viaene

McDermott Will & Emery (Brussels)
Partner

Hendrik Viaene is a partner with McDermott Will & Emery based in the firm’s Brussels office. He focuses his practice on competition law, regulated markets and regulatory law. He advises clients across a wide range of related issues including state aid, cartels, licensing agreements, merger filings, M&A negotiations, abuse of dominance cases, and distribution agreements. Hendrik assists governments as well as privately and publicly owned companies. He has a wealth of experience in a range of sector such as energy, chemicals, paints, automotive, financial data, recycling and waste management, telecom, construction, renewables, media, private equity and the financial industry. Hendrik represents companies before national competition authorities and before the European Commission in state aid, cartel, merger, and abuse of dominance investigations. He also assists governments and companies on defence strategies as well as compliance programmes to avoid fines or having to refund or recover state aid. Hendrik has successfully guided clients through first and second phase investigations in merger clearance proceedings before competition authorities across the globe. He also counsels clients on compliance audits, immunity and leniency initiatives, and general risk avoidance in relation to competition law. Hendrik has additional experience in intellectual property rights licensing initiatives specifically with regard to restrictions imposed by competition law. During his career he has represented clients in proceedings before the European Commission, the European Court of Justice, the Belgian Competition Authority, the Brussels Court of Appeals, the New Caledonian Competition Authority, the Paris Court of Appeals, and the Luxembourg Competition Authority. He acted as co-counsel for other clients for most major competition authorities worldwide, and he also audited a number of competition authorities’ operations and output as a subject matter expert.

Distinctions

Linked authors

McDermott Will & Emery (Paris)
McDermott Will & Emery (Los Angeles)
McDermott Will & Emery (Paris)
McDermott Will & Emery (Brussels)
McDermott Will & Emery (Brussels)

Articles

8555 Bulletin

Jacques Buhart, Christian Krohs, Hendrik Viaene, Frédéric Pradelles, Stéphane Dionnet The EU Court of Justice holds that the General Court erred in law and clarifies several key concepts in the interpretation of merger control rules including standard of proof, “important competitive force”, and “closeness of competition” (Telefónica UK / Hutchison 3G UK)

44

In July 2023, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) annulled the General Court of the European Union’s judgment from 2020. That 2020 judgment, appealed by CK Telecom, had overturned the European Commission’s decision to prohibit CK Telecom’s acquisition of Telefonica UK business in 2016. The (...)

Jacques Buhart, Stéphane Dionnet, Christian Krohs, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene The EU Commission adopts a legislative package to further streamline the simplified merger control procedures within the bloc

105

The EU Commission has adopted a legislative package to further streamline the simplified merger control procedures within the European Union On April 20, 2023, the EU Commission (Commission) adopted and published a package to simplify the procedures for reviewing concentrations under (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Stéphane Dionnet The EU Parliament and Council adopt the Foreign Subsidies Regulation while introducing a new regulatory requirement in addition to merger control and foreign direct investment screening

88

INTRODUCING M&A AND PUBLIC PROCUREMENT NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS WHAT’S NEW On January 12, 2023, Regulation (EU) 2022/2560 of December 14, 2022, on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market entered into force. The Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) puts into place a new (...)

Jacques Buhart, Stéphane Dionnet, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, Mary Hecht, Max Küttner The EU Commission sees the DMA enter into force to ensure contestable and fair markets in the digital sector

62

The European Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act or “DMA”) entered into force on November 1, 2022 (OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, p. 1). Certain provisions of a preparatory nature apply as from that date. The (...)

Jacques Buhart, Stéphane Dionnet, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, Lea Hauser The EU Court of Justice delivers a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of the product scope of a cartel, with practical significance for follow-on damages actions before national courts (Daimler / DAF Trucks)

38

On August 1, 2022 the EU Court of Justice (CJEU) gave a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of the product scope of a cartel found to exist by the EU Commission (EC) in its Decision dated July 19, 2016, C (2016) 4673 final, in Case AT.39824 – Trucks (the Decision). This Decision led (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten, Hannelore Wiame The EU General Court rules that the Commission has the power to review a merger even though the turnover thresholds have not been triggered (Illumina / Grail)

162

In Illumina v Commission, the General Court has confirmed the authority of the European Commission (EC) under Article 22 EU Merger Regulation (EUMR) to examine a transaction that does not have a European dimension, but which is the subject of a referral request made by a Member State – even if (...)

Nabil Lakhal, Andrea Otaola, Jacques Buhart, Stéphane Dionnet, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, Mary Hecht, Max Küttner The EU General Court confirms that the Commission may assess mergers that do not meet the required thresholds if a Member State refers the transaction under Art. 22 EUMR (Illumina / Grail)

32

The GCEU upheld the decision of the EC accepting a referral request from France, as joined by other Member States, asking it to assess the proposed acquisition of GRAIL by Illumina (Judgment of July 13, 2022, Case T-227/21, Illumina, Inc; v Commission). Background On September 21, 2020, (...)

Jacques Buhart, Stéphane Dionnet, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, Mary Hecht, Max Küttner The EU Court of Justice maintains a fine on cartelists notwithstanding the fact that the court partially annuls the fining decision because of procedural errors on the part of the Commission (Optical Disk Drives Cartel)

20

Summary The CJEU on June 16, 2022, partially annulled a EC decision due to a procedural breach, whilst maintaining the imposed EUR 116 million fine. The CJEU found that the EC’s decision did not give the companies opportunity to rebut all infringements separately. At the same time, the (...)

Jacques Buhart, Stéphane Dionnet, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, Philip Bentley The EU General Court annuls the Commission’s decision regarding a dominant chip manufacturer as a result of insufficient analysis of anticompetitive effects and on procedural grounds (Qualcomm)

38

On June 15, 2022, the EU General Court (GCEU) annulled the EU Commission’s (EC) decision C (2018) 240 final dated January 24, 2018 in Case AT.40220 in which the EC had imposed a fine of EUR 997.439 million on Qualcomm Inc. (Qualcomm) for having allegedly abused its dominant position on the (...)

Jacques Buhart, Stéphane Dionnet, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, Mary Hecht, Max Küttner The EU Commission sees its updated Vertical Block Exemption Regulation enter into force, to enable effective governing of companies in the digital age

64

In last year’s EU Competition Review, we reported on the draft of the new Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER). On June 1, 2022, the new VBER finally entered into force. At the same time, the EC published a revised version of the accompanying Vertical Guidelines. These two instruments (...)

Jacques Buhart, Stéphane Dionnet, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, Mary Hecht, Max Küttner The EU General Court upholds the Commission’s decision implementing a €28M fine for gun jumping in the merger of two imaging product manufacturers (Cannon / Toshiba)

39

On June 27, 2019, the EC imposed two fines totaling EUR 28 million on Canon in the context of its acquisition of Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation (TMSC). The first fine of EUR 14 million was levied for Canon’s failure to notify the EC prior to the implementation of the transaction in (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten, Hannelore Wiame The Belgian Competition Authority publishes its annual notice on enforcement priorities, including institutional changes, sustainability goals, and labour markets focus

561

On May 16, 2022, the Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) published its long-awaited notice on enforcement priorities for 2022 (Notice). The BCA explains that, with a view to making the best use of its resources, it will focus its interventions on matters where the expected positive effect of (...)

Jacques Buhart, Stéphane Dionnet, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, Hannelore Wiame The EU General Court decides to reduce the fines for certain undertakings in an airfreight cartel (Airfreight Cartel)

49

Procedural and Factual Background On November 9, 2010, the EU Commission (EC) imposed fines (totaling nearly EUR 800 million) on multiple air freight carriers for their participation in the “air freight cartel” (the 2010 Decision). The case was opened following an immunity application made (...)

Hendrik Viaene, David Henry, Karolien Van der Putten, Hannelore Wiame The EU Council and Parliament reach a political agreement on the regulation of contestable and fair markets in the digital sector

370

On March 24, 2022 the Council of the EU and the European Parliament reached political agreement on the “Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector” (Digital Markets Act or DMA). The political agreement comes just 15 months (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten, Hannelore Wiame The EU Commission adopts Temporary Crisis Framework for State aid measures to support the EU economy following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

534

To mitigate the negative economic and social consequences of Russian military aggression against Ukraine and to lessen the effect of the restrictive economic measures taken in response to the crisis, as well as retaliatory counter measures, the European Commission adopted the Temporary Crisis (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten, Hannelore Wiame The EU Commission sends a draft proposal to the Member States with the aim of establishing a State aid temporary crisis framework to support the EU economy in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

493

The European Commission consults Member States on its draft proposal On March 10, 2022 the European Commission (Commission) sent a draft proposal to EU Member States with the aim of establishing a State aid Temporary Crisis Framework to support the EU economy in the wake of Russia’s invasion (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Hannelore Wiame, Karolien Van der Putten The Belgian Parliament transposes the ECN+ Directive into the national legislation and introduces filing fees in concentration notifications

629

On March 7, 2022, changes to both the Belgian Code of Economic Law (CEL) as well as the Belgian Criminal Code (BCC) were published in the Belgian Official Gazette (Belgisch Staatsblad, Moniteur belge). The main changes include: Introducing a filing fee in notifications of concentrations (...)

Jacques Buhart, Stéphane Dionnet, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, Mary Hecht, Max Küttner, Nabil Lakhal, Andrea Otaola The EU General Court annuls a €1.06B fine on a chip-maker for concluding conditional rebates, emphasising the critical role that economic analysis plays in rebate cases (Intel)

26

At the start of the year, companies offering or considering offering rebates were given further guidance on the limits of such practices. The GCEU’s judgment of January 26, 2022 annulled the EUR 1.06 billion fine against Intel Corporation (Intel) in the 2009 EC decision. The judgment is the (...)

Philip Bentley, Jacques Buhart, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, David Henry, Mary Hecht, Max Küttner The EU Commission investigates a merger between two genomics companies (Illumina / Grail)

248

The EC’s review of Illumina’s acquisition of GRAIL raises two novel issues: the assertion of jurisdiction by the EC over transactions that do not meet any national or EU jurisdictional merger control tests, and the use of interim measures to stop parties closing a transaction where the EC has (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten The EU Court of Justice broadens the scope of follow-on damage claims by permitting actions against the subsidiaries of companies which have been found to have infringed competition law (Sumal / Mercedes Benz Trucks España)

286

On 6 October 2021, the CJEU issued its judgment in Case C-882/19, Sumal, S.L. v Mercedes Benz Trucks España, S.L. (EU:C:1987:418), and confirmed that follow-on damages actions can be brought against subsidiaries of companies found to have infringed EU competition law. The victim of an (...)

Hendrik Viaene State aid & taxation: An overview of EU and national case law

745

This Special Issue collects all contributions available in the e-Competitions database relating to State aid and taxation. This topic has been at the source of many a heated debate. When reviewing the existing European Commission (‘Commission’) decisional practice and the case-law of the (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten The EU General Court upholds a decision from the Commission sanctioning a telecommunications operator for gun jumping and clarifies in its decision the applicable rules (Altice / PT Portugal)

344

On September 22, 2021, the EU General Court (GC) upheld a decision from the European Commission (Commission) by which it fined telecommunications operator Altice for gun jumping (T-425/18, Altice Europe v Commission). In particular, the GC affirmed that the Commission could impose two separate (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten The EU General Court confirms that the Commission was able to fine a telecommunications firm twice for gun jumping, once for breaching the standstill obligation and once for breaching the failure to notify obligation (Altice)

56

On 22 September 2021, the GCEU upheld a decision from the EC by which it fined telecommunications operator Altice for gun-jumping. In particular, the GCEU affirmed that the EC could impose two separate fines: a fine for implementing a concentration prior to its clearance, and a fine for (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten The EU Court of Justice sets aside a General Court ruling and finds that Belgian "excess profit rulings" may constitute a State aid scheme and remands the case back to the General Court to consider whether there was illegal State aid (Magnetrol International)

60

On 16 September 2021, the CJEU delivered its judgment on whether the Belgian system of excess profit rulings (EPRs) constituted a scheme or not. The CJEU set aside the GCEU’s judgment that annulled the EC’s decision qualifying the EPRs as an aid scheme. The CJEU referred the case back to the (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten The EU General Court dismisses the application of two clothing manufacturers seeking to block the Commission from investigating tax rulings on transfer pricing (Nike / Converse)

56

On 14 July 2021, the GCEU dismissed the action brought by Nike and Converse against the EC decision to initiate a formal State aid investigation concerning certain advance tax rulings issued by the Dutch tax authorities for the benefit of Nike and Converse. Background In 2019, the EC (...)

Philip Bentley, Jacques Buhart, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, David Henry, Mary Hecht, Max Küttner, Karolien Van der Putten The EU Commission fines investment banks €371M for participating in a European bonds trading cartel (Bank of America / Natixis / RBS / UBS / UniCredit / WestLB)

118

By decision of 20 May 2021, the EC found that Bank of America, Natixis, Nomura, RBS (now NatWest), UBS, UniCredit and WestLB (now Portigon) breached EU antitrust rules through the participation of a group of traders in a cartel on the primary and secondary markets for European Government Bonds (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten The EU General Court upholds the Commission’s decision which declared that numerous beneficial tax rulings constituted illegal State aid in favour of an energy company (Engie)

82

On 12 May 2021 the GCEU confirmed the EC’s decision of 20 June 2018 that the tax rulings which allowed the Engie group to partially escape tax in Luxembourg constituted illegal State aid within the meaning of Article 107 (1) TFEU. Background As from September 2008, the Luxembourg tax (...)

Philip Bentley, Jacques Buhart, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, David Henry, Mary Hecht The EU Commission imposes fines totalling €48M on 3 railway companies for participating in a cross-border customer allocation cartel (ÖBB / DB / SNCB)

148

On 20 April 2021, the EC issued its settlement decision by which it fined Deutsche Bahn (DB) and Société Nationale des Chemins de fer belges/Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen (SNCB) a total of approximately EUR 48 million for participating in a cross-border customer allocation (...)

Hendrik Viaene, David Henry The EU Commission publishes guidance on the application of the referral mechanism set out in article 22 of the merger regulation to certain categories of cases

427

The European Commission wants to be able to block or conditionally approve transactions, mainly in the digital economy and in the pharmaceutical sector, even when the thresholds for notification are not met. In publishing its new Article 22 Guidance, the Commission has significantly expanded (...)

Philip Bentley, Jacques Buhart, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, David Henry, Mary Hecht, Max Küttner, Karolien Van der Putten The EU Court of Justice dismisses all appeals brought by a Danish pharmaceutical company and five generic manufacturers against the judgments of the General Court and upholds a decision of the Commission on patent settlement agreements between the companies (Lundbeck)

183

On 25 March 2021, the CJEU dismissed all the appeals brought by Danish pharmaceutical company H. Lundbeck A/S and five generic manufacturers against the judgments of the GCEU, thus upholding a decision of the EC on patent settlement agreements between Lundbeck and five generic manufacturers (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten The EU Court of Justice dismisses two telecommunication companies’ appeals on abuse of dominance charges on the grounds that it was not essential for the Commission to show indispensability because the case was not a refusal to supply case, it concerned the imposition of unfair conditions (Slovak Telekom) (Deutsche Telekom)

118

As the incumbent telecommunications operator in Slovakia, Slovak Telekom a.s. (ST) offers broadband services on its fixed copper and fibre optic networks. ST’s networks also include the local loop, i.e., the physical lines which connect the subscriber’s telephone termination point with the (...)

Max Küttner, Mary Hecht, David Henry, Hendrik Viaene, Frédéric Pradelles, Jacques Buhart, Philip Bentley The EU Court of Justice reduces a fine imposed on a steel abrasives cartel on grounds of breach of the principle of equal treatment (Pometon)

109

On 18 March 2021, the CJEU ruled on the appeal by Pometon SpA against the GCEU’s judgment in the steel abrasives cartel case. The CJEU ruled that the GCEU had breached the principle of equal treatment when recalculating the EC’s fine imposed on Pometon, the only non-settling party in this (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten The EU Court of Justice declares that the General Court erred in law by annulling a Commission decision which considered tax exemptions to sports clubs illegal State aid because the Commission does not have to consider the counterfactual tax environment when determining the legality of State aid (Fútbol Club Barcelona)

101

On 4 March 2021, the CJEU rendered its judgment in Case C-362/19, European Commission v Fútbol Club Barcelona, concerning State aid arising out of the taxation of professional sports clubs in Spain. In July 2016, the EC found that Spain had unlawfully implemented aid in the form of a (...)

Philip Bentley, Jacques Buhart, Frédéric Pradelles, Hendrik Viaene, David Henry, Mary Hecht The EU Commission imposes fines totalling €7.9M on a digital distribution company and 5 publishers for geo-blocking (Valve / Bandai Namco / Capcom / Focus Home / Koch Media / ZeniMax)

83

On 20 January 2021, the EC fined Valve Corporation and five publishers, Bandai Namco, Capcom, Focus Home, Koch Media and ZeniMax, a total of EUR 7.9 million for breaching antitrust rules by partitioning the EEA market. Background Valve, together with the five publishers, restricted (...)

Hendrik Viaene, Karolien Van der Putten The Court of Justice preliminarily rules that the end date of a bid-rigging offence is when the "essential characteristics" of the contract have been "definitively determined"(Kilpailu-Ja Kuluttajavirasto)

62

On 14 January 2021, the CJEU delivered a preliminary ruling in which it clarified when a bid-rigging cartel offence comes to an end. This issue is particularly relevant with regard to the imposition of fines within the limitation period. Background In April 2007, Fingrid Oyj, the company (...)

Hendrik Viaene The Belgian Supreme Court confirms Lower Courts’ rulings that appreciable affectation of competition and of trade between member states as required by Article 101 TFEU can be treated implicitly without failing to meet the required burden of proof (Fiat / Fortis Bank / TCI Auto Service)

255

I. The facts On 15 September 1993, an exclusive motor vehicle distribution agreement was signed between Fiat Group Automobiles Belgium NV and TCI Auto Service NV, as a result of which TCI was granted the exclusive distributorship for a number of towns. Fortis Bank NV gave a first call (...)

Hendrik Viaene The Belgian Competition Council finds that a directive adopted by a professional association imposing a maximum fee for a specific service constitutes an infringement by object of the Belgian Competition Act, but decides not to impose a fine, merely a publication obligation (National Chamber of Bailiffs)

167

BE31 [...] & Consorts/Chambre Nationale des Huissiers CONC-P/K-08/0016 Competition Council 08.12.11 I. The facts On 9 July 2008, a number of bailiffs lodged a complaint with the Belgian Competition Council claiming that the National Chamber of Bailiffs infringes Articles 2 and 3 of the (...)

Hendrik Viaene The Brussels Court of Appeal partially reforms interim measures decision of the President of the Belgian Competition Authority in that it limits the duration of the obligation to supply on the diamond market (De Beers / Spira BVBA)

134

I. The Facts The judgment of the Brussels Court of Appeal is one of a long line of decisions and court rulings taken by the European Commission, national competition authorities, the General Court and the Court of Justice concerning De Beers’ decision to alter its distribution system for rough (...)

Books

Statistics


9900
Total visits

198
Number of readings per contribution

50
Number of contributions

Author's ranking
189th
In number of contributions
1016th
In number of visits
6720th
In average number of visits
Send a message