Eamon O’Kelly

Robins Kaplan (New York)
Independent Legal Practitioner

Eamon O’Kelly is an experienced litigator and advisor who focuses his practice on antitrust and trade regulation issues. A leader in the antitrust field, Eamon has represented Fortune 100 companies and European and Asian multinationals. Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP, Eamon led the antitrust group of a 1,500-lawyer international law firm, where he defended publically traded companies in significant “bet the company” litigation across a range of legal matters, including the Sherman Act, Federal Trade Commission Act, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and others. He also represents multinational clients in international arbitrations. In addition to his litigation work, Eamon advises clients on regulatory issues, including mergers and acquisitions, anti-bribery laws, and pricing and distribution.

Linked authors

Winston & Strawn (New York)
Haug Partners (New York)
Winston & Strawn (New York)
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld (Washington)
Winston & Strawn (New York)

Articles

3214 Bulletin

A. Paul Victor, David S. Turetsky, Eamon O’Kelly, John F. Collins The US Supreme Court overturns the Ninth Circuit Court’s decision adopting a new two-part standard for assessing "price-squeeze" antitrust claims (Pacific Bell / linkLine)

379

The Supreme Court recently issued a unanimous decision in a notable "price-squeeze" case under § 2 of the Sherman Act involving rival telecom companies. Pacific Bell Tel. Co. v. Linkline Commc’ns, Inc., No. 07-512 (Feb. 25, 2009). The Court held that a vertically integrated company that had no (...)

A. Paul Victor, Aldo A. Badini, David S. Turetsky, Eamon O’Kelly, Jeffrey L. Kessler A U.S. Court of Appeals overturns an FTC’s ruling in the computer memory market for failing to prove unlawful monopolization (Rambus)

1129

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has overturned the Federal Trade Commission’s ruling against Rambus, Inc. (“Rambus”), finding that the Commission did not prove that Rambus’s failure to disclose certain intellectual property interests to a standard-setting organization (...)

A. Paul Victor, Eamon O’Kelly, Jeffrey L. Kessler, John F. Collins A US Court of Appeals affirms dismissal of conspiracy and monopolization in the elevator industry for failure to meet Twombly pleading standards (In re Elevator Antitrust Litigation)

289

On September 4, 2007, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of all claims in In re Elevator Antitrust Litigation, No. 06-2138-cv, 2007 WL 2471805 (2d Cir. Sept. 4, 2007) (slip opinion available at http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov), finding that the complaint failed to satisfy (...)

A. Paul Victor, Eamon O’Kelly, Jeffrey L. Kessler, John F. Collins The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit rules that bundled discounts will not support a claim under s. 2 of the Sherman Act unless the discounts are below an appropriate measure of costs (Cascade Health Solutions / PeaceHealth)

322

On September 4, 2007 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its much-anticipated decision in Cascade Health Solutions (fka McKenzie- Williamette Hospital) v. PeaceHealth, et al., No. 05-35627, 2007 WL 2473229 (9th Cir. Sept. 4, 2007). The court held that bundled pricing (...)

A. Paul Victor, Eamon O’Kelly, Jeffrey L. Kessler, John F. Collins The US Supreme Court rules that federal and state antitrust claims related to certain IPOs are preempted by federal securities laws (Credit Suisse Securities / Billing)

1095

In a decision announced earlier today, the United States Supreme Court held that federal securities laws implicitly preclude the application of antitrust laws to claims filed against ten leading investment banks over alleged conduct on initial public offerings during the technology boom of the (...)

Send a message