Antitrust in Asia: One size fits all? ASEAN, China, Hong-Kong, India...
See documents
Dominique Lombardi
Rajah & Tann (Singapore)
Partner (Foreign Lawyer)
Dominique, a Foreign Lawyer with the Competition & Antitrust Practice, has extensive experience in European competition and antitrust laws and regulatory issues. Having spent a decade in Asia, she has acquired an intimate knowledge of competition regimes in the region and brings to the Practice a unique dual European/Asian approach. Dominique has worked both in private practice and as an in-house lawyer for a leading corporation in the energy industry. Her expertise covers all aspects of competition/antitrust law - merger control, international cartels (including multi-jurisdictional leniency), vertical restraints, abusive conduct - as well as deregulation law. Dominique has been cited as a leading lawyer by various journals, including Euromoney Experts Guide to the World’s Leading Competition & Antitrust Lawyers, Who’s Who Legal and Best Lawyers. Chambers Asia Pacific notes her ‘very reliable legal analysis’ and describes her as ‘flexible and understands where the client’s priorities lie’. Separately, Dominique is an Adjunct Lecturer at Sorbonne Assas International Law School - Asia, where she lectures on European Competition Law.
Distinctions
Linked authors
Kamilah Kasim
Allen & Gledhill (Singapore)
Kala Anandarajah
Rajah & Tann (Singapore)
Melisa Uremovic
Rajah & Tann (Bangkok)
Supawat Srirungruang
Rajah & Tann (Bangkok)
Jwee Nguan Lee
Competition Commission of Singapore
Dhaniah Ahmad
Shook Lin & Bok
Börries Ahrens
Allen & Overy (Hamburg)
Laurence Idot
University Paris II Panthéon‑Assas
1236 | Conferences
Antitrust in Asia: One size fits all? ASEAN, China, Hong-Kong, India...
See documents
Articles
785 Bulletin
333
Introduction As we move into the second half of the year, we examine two recent competition enforcement cases in Europe, and consider their relevance and applicability in the context of ASEAN competition law. Specifically, we discuss the position taken in Europe with regards to Most Favoured (...)
237
Introduction The Office of Thai Trade Competition Commission in Thailand (‘OTCC’) recently discussed proposed changes to Thailand’s Trade Competition Act 1999 (the ‘Act’) during a public hearing held on 28 October 2014. This is the first substantial review of the Act since its enactment in 1999. (...)
72
Introduction Happy New Year all! We start the year with a coverage of key developments in competition law in Singapore over the past year, and discuss the likely trends looking forward to 2015. We also touch on the upcoming ASEAN Economic Community (“AEC”), which is expected to come into force (...)
143
On 22 April 2013, the Singapore Competition Appeal Board (‘CAB’) published its decisions in Appeal No 2 of 2012 dated 10 April 2013 and Appeal No 3 of 2012 dated 10 April 2013. These appeals were made against the decision of the Competition Commission of Singapore (‘CCS’) in CCS Case number (...)
498 Review
171
To date*, nine out of the ten ASEAN countries have introduced a generic competition law. Whilst all of these ASEAN competition laws deal with anti-competitive agreements (whether horizontal or vertical or both) and abuses of dominance, not all ASEAN countries have chosen to provide for a merger (...)
327
Consistent with the ASEAN Member States’ commitment towards introducing a competition policy by 2015, Malaysia’s generic competition legislation, the Competition Act 2010 (’Act’) came into force on 1 January 2012. Malaysia is thus the sixth ASEAN country to have introduced a generic competition (...)
68 rue Amelot
106 West 32nd Street, Suite 144
New York, NY, 10001, USA
