Benjamin C., Jr. Crisman
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Washington DC)
Lawyer (Partner)
C. Benjamin Crisman, Jr. focuses on antitrust, trade regulation and white collar crime matters. He has been selected for inclusion in Chambers Global: The World’s Leading Lawyers for Business, Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business and The Best Lawyers in America. In Mr. Crisman’s antitrust practice, he has obtained Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission approval for a number of high-profile and complex mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Crisman’s background as a prosecutor at the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division and as special assistant U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia has given him broad exposure to white collar criminal work, including grand jury and global cartel enforcement defense work in the natural resources, construction pipe, entertainment, defense contracting, electrical, architectural hardware and food/beverage industries.
Linked authors
Steven C. Sunshine
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Washington DC)
James A. Keyte
Fordham Competition Law Institute - FCLI (New York)
John M. Nannes
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Washington DC)
Shepard Goldfein
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)
Patrick Rey
Institut d’économie Industrielle (IDEI)
Pascal Cardonnel
European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)
Kaarli Harry Eichhorn
Jones Day (Brussels)
Johannes Luebking
DG COMP (Brussels)
391 | Conferences
Articles
479 Bulletin
254
On March 18, 2009, Judge Collyer of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia released the public version of a significant opinion supporting her order granting the FTC a preliminary injunction in connection with the proposed $1.4 billion merger of CCC Information Systems (...)
225
On June 14 2004, in a unanimous judgment, the Supreme Court blocked foreign plaintiffs from bringing an antitrust claim in U.S. courts seeking damages based on higher foreign prices that are allegedly independent of the domestic effects of higher domestic prices. However, the case was remanded (...)
