


Antonio Capobianco
Antonio Capobianco is a senior expert in competition law enforcement with the OECD competition division. He is responsible for the proceedings of the working party No. 3 of the Competition Committee on International Co-operation and Antitrust Law Enforcement. Prior to joining the OECD, Antonio Capobianco was a counsel in the competition department of WilmerHale LLP, resident in the Brussels office. He also spent two years with the Italian Competition Authority. He is author of several articles on antitrust issues published on major international law journals specialized in competition law. He also co-edited a textbook on Italian competition law and economics and is a contributor to the book "EC Competition Law, A Critical Assessment" edited by Amato and Ehlermann, Hart Publishing 2007. Antonio Capobianco graduated in law at the L.U.I.S.S. - Guido Carli in Rome and holds post graduate degrees from the New York University School of Law (LL.M. in Trade Regulation and Antitrust) and from the Institute of European Studies of the Université Libre de Bruxelles (Licence Spéciale in European Law).
Linked authors
2173 | Events

Articles
1763 Bulletin
809
It is the overriding belief that the EU competition rules should be applied uniformly and the European Competition Network (ECN) was established for attaining such aim. While the ECN has functioned successfully during its initial stages and still represents one of the most developed co-operation competition frameworks of the world, this foreword will explore how the Network worked in recent years and whether it is time to update it, also considering the challenges presented by the digitalisation of the economy. This foreword will: (i) describe the ECN working mechanism (section n. 2); (ii) report and analyse the main developments and cases affecting/influencing the European competition authorities’ ability to co-operate (section n. 3); and (iii) offer a short discussion of areas of possible development for the ECN (section n. 4).
455
In 2004, two cases on exchanges of information between competitors were decided by the Italian competition authority (“AGCM” – the Autorità Garante per la Concorrenza ed il Mercato). This revived a lively debate on the conditions in which these practices should be prohibited and whether they (...)
499
In 2004, two cases on exchanges of information between competitors were decided by the Italian competition authority (“AGCM” – the Autorità Garante per la Concorrenza ed il Mercato). This revived a lively debate on the conditions in which these practices should be prohibited and whether they (...)
3320 Review
3320
Ces trois brefs articles présentent trois points de vue sur la théorie de l’entreprise défaillante. Le premier décrit les moyens de preuve de l’entreprise défaillante à travers trois études de cas. Celles-ci mettent en lumière les preuves qui peuvent être utilisées, ainsi que les analyses qui (...)
Statistics

7256

1209.3

6

Author's ranking