Martine Behar-Touchais

University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne
Professor

Martine Behar-Touchais is Professor of private law at the School of Law of the Sorbonne( University of Paris 1), where she co-directs the Institute for Legal Research of the Sorbonne (IRJS Institute Tunc). She is also director of the working group "Contracts, consumer and e-commerce" of Trans Europe Network experts (TEE), which organizes with other members of Trans Europe experts studies (online games, class actions, personal data, private enforcement Intensification in favour of victims of anti-competitive practices, etc ...) and which responds to calls for tenders of the european Parliament or the european Commission. She has been a member of the collegium of the Competition Council from January 2003 to January 2009. She is specialized in competition law, consumer law, and contract law, especially the distribution contracts.

Linked authors

University Paris II Panthéon‑Assas
Paris Court of Appeal
Fidal (Paris)
Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
Amadio Parleani Gazagnes
Nanterre Commercial Court
Comité de déontovigilance des entreprises du médicament
White & Case (Paris)

Videos

Martine Behar-Touchais (Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne)
Martine Behar-Touchais 14 May 2018 Paris
Martine Behar-Touchais (Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne)
Martine Behar-Touchais 29 March 2018 Paris
Martine BÉHAR-TOUCHAIS - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris I)
Martine Behar-Touchais 30 September 2014 Paris

Articles

25654 Review

Martine Behar-Touchais Customer allocation : The Court of Justice of the European Union considers that customer allocation agreements concluded between private pensions funds in the main proceedings, constitute agreements with an anti-competitive object, the number of clients affected by such an agreement being irrelevant for the purpose of assessing the requirement relating to the restriction of competition within the internal market (ING Pensii)

213

The present case involves customer allocation agreements between private pension funds. Romanian law requires persons under 35 years of age who contribute to the public pension scheme to join a pension fund (Article 30 of Law No 411/2004). Since everyone is free to choose his or her pension (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais LCD Cartel : The Court of Justice of the European Union refuses to follow the conclusions of the Advocate General Wathelet and considers that the Commission could have imposed a fine on a company, taking into account the value of intragroup deliveries (Innolux)

276

It will be recalled that Advocate General Wathelet had concluded that the judgment of the Court of First Instance in the LCD cartel case and the Commission’s decision in this case should be set aside, in so far as they had decided that the fine imposed on an undertaking could legally take into (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Continuous infringement : The General Court of the European Union sanctions the participation of an undertaking in a single and continuous infringement, notably based on evidence obtained during the transaction procedure that has yet aborted for this company, and confirms the fine of nearly € 60 million (Timab Industries, CFPR)

337

By its decision of 20 July 2010 ((2010) 5001 final), the European Commission found that the main European producers of phosphates for animal feed (PAA) had agreed to share a large part of the European PAA market by allocating sales quotas by region and by customer. In addition, they had (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Exchange of information : The Court of Justice of the European Union confirms that strategic information exchange is a restriction of competition by object (Dole Food, Dole Fresh Fruit Europe)

452

CJEU 19 March 2015, Dole Food and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe v Commission, Case C-286/13 P It is interesting, after the Groupement des Cartes Bancaires judgment ("Groupement des Cartes Bancaires" judgment in CB v Commission, C-67/13 P, EU:C:2014:2204(see paragraph 49 and the case-law cited), (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Imputability : The Court of Justice of the European Union annuls the General Court’s judgment that refused to apply the principle of economic continuity to a transfer of activities carried out by a parent company to its 100 % subsidiary (Parker Hannifin)

401

CJEU, 18 Dec. 2014, Commission v Parker Hannifin, Case C-434/13 P This case illustrates once again the problems of competition law in the face of restructuring. In 2001, Parker-Hannifin, the umbrella company of the Parker-Hannifin Group, and Saiag entered into discussions regarding the (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Professional order : The General Court of the European Union confirms that the French National Order of Pharmacists restricted competition in the market for clinical laboratory tests, but reduces the penalty from 5 to 4.75 million euros (Ordre national des pharmaciens)

307

The judgments of the Court of Justice of 19 May 2009 (Case C-109/08) and the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Case C-109/08) are well known. C-171/07 and 172/07 Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes and Others (C-171/07) and Helga Neumann-Seiwert (C-172/07) v Saarland and (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Collective agreement : The Court of Justice of the European Union states the conditions under which the provision of a collective labor agreement providing for minimum rates for independent service providers affiliated with one of the organizations contracting workers does not fall within the scope of Article 101§1 TFEU (FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media)

366

According to established case law, inaugurated by the Albany judgment (ECJ 21 September 1999 aff. C-67/96; see also Brentjens’, ECJ 21 September 1999 aff. C-115/97 to C-117/97, Drijvende Bokken, ECJ 21 September 1999 aff. C-219/97; Pavlov, ECJ 21 September 1999 cases C-180/98 to C-184/98; Van (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Marketing agreements : The Paris Court of Appeals partially reforms the decision of the French Competition Authority related to anticompetitive practices in the flour industry sector (Grands moulins de Paris)

337

By Decision No. 12-D-09 of March 13, 2012242.6 million, the Competition Authority had sanctioned three cartels in the bagged flour sector (see D. Bosco, "Cartels in the food sector: would the Authority go ’a bit far’?"). Contracts conc. consom. May 2012, comm. 131). The case had started in March (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Ceiling of the fine : The Court of Justice of the European Union establishes a connection between the limit of the fine and the concept of undertaking in case of succession of liable undertakings, but decides that the multiplying factor with its dissuasive effect must take into account the size and the resources of the companies (YKK)

298

This much-awaited judgment raises the question of the possible modulation of the ceiling of the fine in the event of a succession of responsibilities in the commission of the offence. In this case, where an undertaking is held solely responsible for an infringement for a given period and was (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Online sale: The French Competition Authority opens an in-depth enquiry on selective distribution agreements containing a prohibition to sell the contract products through marketplaces (Concurrence)

354

The company Competition is to competition law what the Patino couple are to private international law: a business contributor, and a spur, because in the abundance of questions asked by this operator, there is often at least one relevant one. In this case, the company Competition, which (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais French collective redress: A promising or a (too) limited path? (Antitrust damages actions in France and in Europe : Current situation and upcoming changements, Paris, 13 May 2014)

519

The Hamon law created the French collective redress. This collective redress has an attractive future, because: First, it will avoid the risk of prescription of private follow on actions. Second, when the competitive fault is established in the decision of the ANC, the civil fault is (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Calculation of the fine : The Court of Justice of the European Union recalls that, in order to set the sanction, the Commission has to appreciate the desired impact on the company by taking into account the turnover which reflects its real economic situation (Garantovana)

190

This judgment clarifies the concept of previous financial year, referred to in Article 23(2) of Regulation 1/2003. It should be noted that the text states that ’for each undertaking and association of undertakings participating in the infringement, the fine shall not exceed 10 % of its total (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Competition and gambling sector

746

The gambling market has been partially opened to competition by the law of 12 May 2010. Nevertheless, in this area, there are always legal operators and illegal operators (although the ex ante regulation of ARJEL has contributed as much as possible to oust the illegal offering), and there are (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Imputability: The Court of Justice of the European Union decides on the imputability of anticompetitive practices in case of succession of parent companies and on the solidarity of the fines in case of succession of parent companies in corporate restructuring (Siemens, Areva, Alstom)

581

CJEU, 10 April 2014, Areva and Others v Commission, cases C-247/11 and C-253/11. The imputability of anti-competitive practices in restructuring is not an easy task (cf. the DGCCRF Competition Workshop of 25 June 2014, co-directed by C. Lemaire and ourselves, online: (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Recidive: The General Court of the European Union refuses to impose to the parent company the first of a series of repeat offenses, for which it had not been pursued with its subsidiary (Saint-Gobain)

157

Between the beginning of 1998 and the beginning of 2003, the three main operators in the automotive glass sector in Europe, Asahi, Pilkington and Saint-Gobain, entered into illegal market-sharing agreements and exchanged commercially sensitive information concerning supplies of automotive glass (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Penalties: The French Supreme Court decides that the principle of individualisation of the penalty implies, under certain circumstances, not taking into account of the belonging to a group of a company, in the determination of the penalty (Cartel de la restauration des monuments historiques)

309

The question of determining the penalty for an anti-competitive practice has often posed difficulties when the practice is committed by an enterprise that is part of a group of companies. Article L. 464-2, paragraph 4 of the French Commercial Code (in its wording resulting from the NRE law of (...)

Martine Behar-Touchais Complex anticompetitive agreement: The Paris court of appeal rejects action against the decision of the French Competition Authority fining the detergent cartel (Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Henkel, Colgate Palmolive)

393

It will be recalled that by Decision No. 11-D-17 of 8 December 2011367.9 million, the French Competition Authority had sanctioned a cartel between the four laundry detergent manufacturers active in France (Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Henkel and Colgate Palmolive) in the amount of The (...)

Dominique de Gramont, Jacqueline Riffault-Silk, Jean-Daniel Bretzner, Laurence Idot, Louis Martin, Marie-Hélène Huertas, Martine Behar-Touchais, Michel Ponsard, Muriel Chagny, Valérie Pironon, Yann Utzschneider Contractual practices and competition (Paris, October 25th 2010)

3376

This article reproduces the opening papers delivered at the AFEC conference on contractual practices and competition law in Paris on October 25, 2010. According to the Professor Chagny, the examination of the links between contractual practices and competition law lato sensu reveals (...)

Dominique Thesmar, Gilbert Parleani, Jean-Bertrand Drummen, Jean-Louis Fourgoux, Laurence Idot, Martine Behar-Touchais, Muriel Chagny, Valérie Michel Amsellem, Yann Utzschneider Colloque: Restrictive trade practices under the LME Act (AFEC, Paris, 6th October 2008)

4832

Introductory remarks Laurence Idot Professor, Universtité Paris II, European College Director of the Scientific Committee of Concurrences Madam President, Ladies and Gentlemen, Dear friends, As the afternoon is busy, I will not go into the substance of the colloquium, but on behalf of AFEC (...)

Books

Price 45€00 A quoi sert la concurrence ?

Voir l’avant-propos de Laurence Idot, Frédéric Jenny et Nicolas CharbitLa préface de Martine Béhar-Touchais La liste complète des contributeurs ainsi que la table des matières Valérie Benabou:100 (...)

Date 30 September 2014
Author(s): Martine Behar-Touchais, Nicolas Charbit, Rafael Amaro
Price 45€00
Read online
Send a message