accueil

Get in touch with the authors!

#
restreint oui acces refuse

Autorisations article

Autorisations visiteur

  • *** Visiteur non identifié! *** => L'article que vous souhaitez visualiser est réservé à nos abonnés.
    Pour visualiser cet article nous vous invitons à vous abonner en cliquant ici.
    si vous êtes déja abonné, nous vous invitons à vous identifier en cliquant là
L'article 25825 est traduit en English => on affiche cette traduction (article 25826)

Contenu article Revue payant abstract - type [E]

Belgium: Two years of competition reform - An interim report

INTERNATIONAL: 2006 BELGIAN COMPETITION REFORM - MERGER CONTROL - ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCES - COMPETITION COUNCIL - PUNITIVE POWERS - SECTOR SPECIFIC REGULATORS

A little more than to years following its inception, this article seeks to assess whether the new Belgian competition law of 2006 has delivered its purported ambitions. We come to the conclusion that, on three core aspects, the reform has not (yet?) reached its ambitious goals. First, whilst the elevation of the merger control thresholds has certainly freed-up significant administrative resources, most of these resources were subsequently reallocated to the examination of prescribed cases. Second, whilst the Competition Council enjoys unprecedented punitive powers under the new law, it has so far failed to implement them and, on the contrary, exhibits a noticeable reluctance to inflict fines for anticompetitive practices. Third, a number of decisions demonstrate that the new legislation has not eradicated conflicts between the Competition Council and sector specific regulators.

Tables appear in the pdf version of this article.

Language:

français
Date of publication: April 2009
Alexandre Defossez, Nicolas Petit, Belgium: Two years of competition reform - An interim report, April 2009, Concurrences Review N° 2-2009, Art. N° 25826, pp. 222-229

Extra article Revue payant abstract - type [E]

Abstract
rien 4692 visits (French and English versions)