The Austrian Supreme Court once again finds that an integrated film distributor and cinema operator abused its dominant position by refusing to supply copies of its films to rival cinema operators (Constantin-Film)

This case is the latest instalment in a series of claims for refusal to deal brought by Austrian cinema operators against Constantin-Film, a company active in Austria both as a distributor of cinema films and as an operator of a large number of cinemas. Like the previous decisions against Constantin-Film [1], the decision in this case reveals a generous application of the refusal to supply/essential facilities doctrine. In the case at hand, the applicant, who operates a small cinema in rural Austria, brought an action in the Cartel Court, arguing that Constantin-Film had abused its dominant position on the market for film distribution by refusing to supply her with a copy of the film "Asterix at the Olympic Games". The Cartel Court granted the application. While it recognized that

L'accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement un article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Version PDF

Auteurs

Citation

Axel Reidlinger, Heinrich Kühnert, The Austrian Supreme Court once again finds that an integrated film distributor and cinema operator abused its dominant position by refusing to supply copies of its films to rival cinema operators (Constantin-Film), 16 juillet 2008, Bulletin e-Competitions July 2008, Art. N° 22387

Visites 2018

Tous les numéros

  • Latest News issue 
  • Tous les News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • Tous les Special issues