AWA 2017 - Results soon [FR]
Hong Kong 2017 [FR]
accueil

Faites connaissance avec les auteurs !

#

Contenu article Bulletin Payant Abstract - type [D]

The Austrian Supreme Court once again finds that an integrated film distributor and cinema operator abused its dominant position by refusing to supply copies of its films to rival cinema operators (Constantin-Film)

Mots clés

Pratiques unilatérales - Abus de position dominante - Refus de vente - Marché pertinent - Position dominante (notion) - Audiovisuel

This case is the latest instalment in a series of claims for refusal to deal brought by Austrian cinema operators against Constantin-Film, a company active in Austria both as a distributor of cinema films and as an operator of a large number of cinemas. Like the previous decisions against Constantin-Film [1], the decision in this case reveals a generous application of the refusal to supply/essential facilities doctrine. In the case at hand, the applicant, who operates a small cinema in rural Austria, brought an action in the Cartel Court, arguing that Constantin-Film had abused its dominant position on the market for film distribution by refusing to supply her with a copy of the film "Asterix at the Olympic Games". The Cartel Court granted the application. While it recognized that

Déjà abonné ? Identifiez-vous

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux abonnés.

Lire gratuitement cet article

Vous pouvez lire cet article gratuitement en vous inscrivant.

 

Abstract

Citation :

Axel Reidlinger, Heinrich Kühnert, The Austrian Supreme Court once again finds that an integrated film distributor and cinema operator abused its dominant position by refusing to supply copies of its films to rival cinema operators (Constantin-Film), 16 juillet 2008, Bulletin e-Competitions July 2008, Art. N° 22387

visites:

1996 (version française et anglaise)