Pallavi Shroff

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (New Delhi)
Lawyer (Managing Partner)

Pallavi Shroff is a senior partner, and the national head of the competition law practice, at Amarchand Mangaldas. Mrs Shroff has over 30 years of experience in advising high-profile clients on contentious matters relating to litigation, arbitration and competition law. As a member of the high-powered SVS Raghavan committee, she played a key role in the conception of the new Indian competition law regime. More recently, she was a member of the national competition policy committee and regularly participates in competition advocacy initiatives. Mrs Shroff is also a well-renowned advocate for competition law cases before the Competition Commission of India and the Competition Appellate Tribunal. She has contributed to various international competition law publications and regularly speaks at national and international forums. Mrs Shroff has been acclaimed in the competition sphere by Chambers & Partners as “a legal luminary with the brilliant acumen necessary to crack the most complex legal cases” ; the guide adds that “her knowledge in competition law is unparalleled”, and places her among only a few lawyers in the top tier. Chambers Asia Pacific (2013) describes Mrs Shroff as “an extremely talented lawyer” who is "brilliant in this field”. She has also featured in Who’s Who Legal : Competition for the last three years.

Auteurs associés

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (Mumbai)

Articles

1166 Bulletin

Aparna Mehra, Gauri Chhabra, Harman Singh Sandhu, John Handoll, Manika Brar, Naval Satarawala Chopra, Pallavi Shroff, Shweta Shroff Chopra The Indian Competition Authority holds that information exchange is not a standalone violation of the Indian Competition Act (Flashlights cartel)

147

On 6 November 2018, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) found that four manufacturers/traders of flashlights and their trade association (the Opposite Parties) were not involved in cartelisation as, despite an information exchange, there was not enough corroborating evidence to suggest a (...)

Aparna Mehra, Gauri Chhabra, Harman Singh Sandhu, John Handoll, Manika Brar, Naval Satarawala Chopra, Pallavi Shroff, Shweta Shroff Chopra The Indian Competition Authority conditionally clears a merger in the agrochemicals and seeds industry (Bayer / Monsanto)

473

In an order dated 14 June 2018, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) approved Bayer AG’s (Bayer) acquisition of Monsanto Company (Monsanto) (together, the Parties) subject to certain modifications. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. represented Monsanto and assisted in seeking the CCI’s (...)

Naval Satarawala Chopra, Pallavi Shroff, Shweta Shroff Chopra The Competition Commission of India grants a 75% reduction in penalty in a cartel case applying leniency program (Suo Moto Case)

275

Introduction The Competition Commission of India (CCI) in the first ever decision involving leniency in a cartel case (Suo Moto Case No. 03 of 2014 – In Re : Cartelization in respect of tenders floated by Indian Railways for supply of Brushless DC Fans and other electrical items), published on (...)

Naval Satarawala Chopra, Pallavi Shroff, Shweta Shroff Chopra The Indian Government publishes notifications enhancing the existing jurisdictional thresholds in the merger control regime amending the existing exemptions

77

The Indian merger control regime under the Competition Act, 2002 (Competition Act) has been in force for nearly five years. The provisions of the Competition Act are to be read together with the notifications issued, from time to time, by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India (...)

Naval Satarawala Chopra, Pallavi Shroff, Shweta Shroff Chopra The Competition Commission of India fines an undertaking for failing to notify a merger within 30 days of the trigger date (GE)

133

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has recently imposed a penalty of INR 5 crores (approximately USD 750,000) on GE for its failure to notify the proposed acquisition of Alstom companies within 30 days of the trigger date. The penalty imposed on GE is the highest penalty for late filing (...)

Envoyer un message