LEGAL PRACTICE: PROCEDURES - SANCTIONS - COMPENSATION - JURISDICTION - HARM - INQUIRIES - PRESCRIPTION

Private enforcement of antitrust law in France (March 2018 – July 2018)

The commented decisions indicate the recurrent nature of procedural questions, especially those pertinent to national and international competence. Other decisions confirm the ever-growing litigation about compensation applying to the administrative court as well as the importance of the harm updating before the judicial court. An interesting decision in principle by the German Supreme Court on the suspensive effect of the statute of limitations of competition authorities’ investigative acts should also be noted.

Sélection de décisions pertinentes rendues dans la période sous commentaire. Les décisions commentées dans la présente chronique sont marquées d’un astérisque, les autres sont simplement citées sans être commentées en détail. CJUE, 2e ch., 5 juill. 2018, FlyLal, aff. C-27/17, EU:C:2018:533* Bundesgerichtshof (Cour suprême fédérale d’Allemagne), 12 juin 2018, Kemmler Beton GmbH c/ HeidelbergCement AG, aff. n° KZR 56/16, ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:120618UKZR56.16.0* Cass. com., 17 janv. 2018, n° 17-10.360, Bull. civ. IV, n° 87 ; D. 2018, p. 116 Cass. com., 3 mai 2018, n° 16-27.926, inédit, ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CO00354 Cass. com., 16 mai 2018, n° 16-18.174 , Bull. civ. IV, n°495, ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CO00495 Cass. com., 10 juill. 2018, n° 17-16.365, Bull. civ. IV, n° 696 ; ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CO00696* CAA Nantes, 4e ch., 16

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University Paris V Descartes

Quotation

Rafael Amaro, Private enforcement of antitrust law in France (March 2018 – July 2018), November 2018, Concurrences Review N° 4-2018, Art. N° 88142, pp. 223-235

Visites 201

All reviews