CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – SEPARATE FACTS

Trademark infringement action: The French Supreme Court holds that the inscription of someone else’s trademark on a counterfait shoe brings discredit on a shoe collection of this brand – to clients and consumers – and creates a brand image harm, which is separate from the shoe slavish imitation retained for trademark infringement (Pindière / Venaty et Creaciones)

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Université Littoral-Cote d’Opale (Boulogne/Mer)

Quotation

Valérie Durand, Trademark infringement action: The French Supreme Court holds that the inscription of someone else’s trademark on a counterfait shoe brings discredit on a shoe collection of this brand – to clients and consumers – and creates a brand image harm, which is separate from the shoe slavish imitation retained for trademark infringement (Pindière / Venaty et Creaciones), 1 September 2016, Concurrences Review Nº 3-2016, Art. N° 80842, p. 106

Visites 63

All reviews