The 2016 New York University School of Law conference, jointly organized with Concurrences Review, was held on October 28 on "Competition and Globalization in Developing Economies". The trade and competition regimes have markedly different degrees of formality at the international level and operate largely independently of one another. Despite this observation, there are a range of issues where collaboration between trade and competition professionals would be fruitful. Considering how rapidly emerging economies are taking center stage in antitrust enforcement, care must be taken to ensure appropriate integration into international rules-based frameworks. This article explores the proposed modifications to the Antitrust Guidelines the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission and compares it with the approaches of other jurisdictions.
The place of competition and development in the global trade and economic architecture
Jonathan T. Fried Canada’s Ambassador to the WTO, Geneva
1. Just over one year ago, and just up the road, all of the world’s governments made a historic decision. At the UN General Assembly, they unanimously adopted what have come to be known as the “Sustainable Development Goals,” or officially, “The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”  This agenda comprises 17 goals, and 169 targets to support, as they put it, people, planet, prosperity and peace. And lest you too quickly come to the conclusion that this was about the environment, and part of the lead-up to the Paris climate change agreement, to the contrary this Agenda addresses environmental, social, and economic sustainability.
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read this article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.
This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.