CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – RETAIL SECTOR – LEGAL ACTION OF THE MINISTER – ASSESSMENT OF IMBALANCE – EVIDENCE

Significant imbalance: The French Supreme Court is gradually building up strict legal precedents concerning significant imbalance in contracts in the retail sector (EMC distribution)

Après quelques années d’attente, voici que les décisions de la Cour de cassation sur le “déséquilibre significatif” commencent à fleurir. L’arrêt rapporté, en date du 29 septembre 2015, confirme et affermit, sous la forme d’une longue décision de rejet, ce qu’ont laissé entrevoir trois autres arrêts remarqués rendus ces derniers mois (Cass. com., 3 mars 2015, n° 13-27525, Eurauchan, Concurrences n° 2-2015, p. 117, obs. J.-L. Fourgoux ; D. 2015, p. 1021, note F. Buy ; AJCA 2015, p. 218, note G. Chantepie ; Cass. com., 3 mars 2015, n° 14-10907, Provera, Concurrences n° 2-2015, p. 117, obs. J.-L. Fourgoux ; AJCA 2015, p. 218, note G. Chantepie ; Cass. com., 27 mai 2015, n° 14-11387, Galec, Concurrences n° 4-2015, p. 138, obs. M. Chagny ; RTD civ. 2015, p. 606, obs. H. Barbier ; adde, sur l’ensemble de ces

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Frédéric Buy, Significant imbalance: The French Supreme Court is gradually building up strict legal precedents concerning significant imbalance in contracts in the retail sector (EMC distribution), 29 September 2015, Concurrences Review N° 1-2016, Art. N° 77387, 119-120

Visites 194

All reviews