A US Court of Appeals overturns an FTC’s ruling in the computer memory market for failing to prove unlawful monopolization (Rambus)

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has overturned the Federal Trade Commission’s ruling against Rambus, Inc. (“Rambus”), finding that the Commission did not prove that Rambus’s failure to disclose certain intellectual property interests to a standard-setting organization (“SSO”) allowed Rambus to monopolize the relevant technology markets. The court also expressed concerns about the sufficiency of the FTC’s evidence regarding the SSO’s disclosure policies and Rambus’s alleged violation of those policies. Background Rambus is a developer of computer memory that licenses intellectual property rights to manufacturers. In 1990, Rambus filed a patent application for a faster architecture for dynamic random access memory (“DRAM”), and thereafter filed various amendments and

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld (Washington)
  • Winston & Strawn (New York)
  • Winston & Strawn (New York)
  • Arent Fox (New York)
  • Winston & Strawn (New York)

Quotation

David S. Turetsky, Jeffrey L. Kessler, A. Paul Victor, Eamon O'Kelly, Aldo A. Badini, A US Court of Appeals overturns an FTC’s ruling in the computer memory market for failing to prove unlawful monopolization (Rambus), 22 April 2008, e-Competitions Bulletin IT & Dominance, Art. N° 37369

Visites 1081

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues