The German Federal Court of Justice clarifies that access to an essential facility does not require a dominant position in the up- or downstream market in the electricity sector (Arealnetze)

On June 28, 2005, the German Federal Court of Justice (FCJ) clarified that the so called “essential facility clause” of Sec. 19(4) n° 4 of the German Act against Restraints of Competition (ARC) requires dominance only in the market for the essential facility itself. Contrary to the view of some commentators, it is not necessary that the owner of the essential facility is dominant on the downstream market as well. I. Facts of the case Several firms wanted to establish so-called “area networks” for electricity in development areas in Frankfurt upon Main. They had built small free-standing low-voltage power grids which connected their customers' households and/or enterprises with a voltage transformation substation. In order to supply their customers with electricity, these area networks

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Florian Wagner-von Papp, The German Federal Court of Justice clarifies that access to an essential facility does not require a dominant position in the up- or downstream market in the electricity sector (Arealnetze), 28 June 2005, e-Competitions Bulletin Energy & Dominance, Art. N° 488

Visites 5333

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues