The French Supreme Court holds that low-price practice cannot be sanctioned on the basis of tort law if it does not fall under competition provisions (Usines Merger / Giat Industries)

In a judgement delivered on December, 6th 2005, the commercial Chamber of the French Supreme Court ruled on the relationship between competition provisions and unfair trading provisions on the one hand and tort law provisions on the other hand. The issue at stake concerned the practice of low prices. Usines Merger complained before the Versailles Commercial Court of first instance that Giat Industries, its holding Gitech and subsidiary Foc Transmission were to be held liable for anticompetitive practices, abuse of dominant position and unfair trading practices on a specific engine automotive market (speed reducers) under the basis of Articles L 420-1

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Stephan Reifegerste, The French Supreme Court holds that low-price practice cannot be sanctioned on the basis of tort law if it does not fall under competition provisions (Usines Merger / Giat Industries), 6 December 2005, e-Competitions Bulletin Economic assessment of damages, Art. N° 1138

Visites 4000

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues