Oregon and Delaware Courts differ on enforceability of unilaterally adopted forum selection bylaws in a merger case (Micro Devices, TriQuint Semiconductor)

While forum selection bylaws have become increasingly popular with US public companies, courts in Delaware and Oregon recently came to opposite conclusions on whether such bylaws, when unilaterally adopted by a board of directors concurrently with the approval of a merger transaction, should be enforced. In August, an Oregon court found such a bylaw unenforceable as against public policy. A few weeks later, in September, a Delaware court found a similar bylaw enforceable and dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint. This split among the courts highlights that even though there is increasing consensus that unilaterally approved forum selection bylaws are facially valid, courts may scrutinize the particular circumstances under which such bylaws are adopted. In February 2014, RF Micro

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Dufner Daniel G., Chang-Do Gong, Daniel M. Latham, Oregon and Delaware Courts differ on enforceability of unilaterally adopted forum selection bylaws in a merger case (Micro Devices, TriQuint Semiconductor), 8 September 2014, e-Competitions Bulletin US Mergers in IT, Art. N° 68914

Visites 108

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues