The EU General Court confirms that the Netherlands is not breaching State aid rules by funding an in-house e-procurement platform (Aanbestedingskalender BV and others)

Funding of in-house entities, CPBs and risks of state aid, some thoughts re Aanbestedingskalender (T-138/15)* In its Judgment of 28 September 2017, Aanbestedingskalender & Others v Commission, T-138/15, EU:T:2017:675, the General Court (GC) rejected a complaint against a previous Commission decision (SA.34646) that the Netherlands had not breached EU State aid rules by funding TenderNed—an in-house e-procurement platform run by PIANOo, the tendering expertise centre for the Dutch government. The complaint derived from the fact that, prior to the creation of TenderNed, private providers of e-procurement services had been offering their services to Dutch contracting authorities. The creation of TenderNed and the offering of services free of charge to contracting authorities by this

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Albert Sánchez Graells, The EU General Court confirms that the Netherlands is not breaching State aid rules by funding an in-house e-procurement platform (Aanbestedingskalender BV and others), 28 September 2017, e-Competitions Bulletin September 2017, Art. N° 88456

Visites 19

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues