A Chinese Court issues second abuse of dominance’s decision under the new anti-monopoly law (Baidu,TRISC)

On December 18, 2009, a Chinese court ruled in favor of Baidu, Inc. (“Baidu”), allegedly the largest Chinese search engine company, in a lawsuit filed by Tangshan Renren Information Service Company (“TRISC”), an online information platform. TRISC alleged that Baidu abused its dominant market position by downgrading TRISC in Baidu search results. This is the first Internet-related anti-monopoly lawsuit decided under the Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law (“AML”), which took effect in August 2008. I. Background TRISC operates an online platform linking medicine manufacturers with distributors and users. TRISC claimed that Baidu abused its dominant position in the Chinese search engine market by lowering its search ranking in Baidu search results. TRISC alleged Baidu caused TRISC‘s website to be

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Peter J. Wang, Yizhe Zhang, H. Stephen Harris, A Chinese Court issues second abuse of dominance’s decision under the new anti-monopoly law (Baidu,TRISC), 18 December 2009, e-Competitions Bulletin December 2009, Art. N° 33758

Visites 974

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues