Three French Courts acknowledged State’s liability towards aid recipients for not having granted un-notified State aid (Kélian, Fontanille, Salmon Arc-en-ciel)

Administrative Court of Grenoble (Tribunal administratif de Grenoble), 15 October 2003, Sté Stéphane Kélian, Case n° 0102341 Administrative Court of Clermont-Ferrand (Tribunal administratif de Clermond-Ferrand), 23 September 2004, SA Fontanille, Case n° 0101282, AJDA, 2005, p. 386 These two cases are in relation to the setting of the plan Borotra (Article 99 of Law n° 96-314 of 12 April 1996 implementing various economic and financial provisions [1]) aimed at fighting the fall of employment in the textile, clothing, leather and footwear industries. The Law permitted the State, on an experimental and temporary basis, to grant to employers in the textile, clothing, leather and footwear industries additional reductions in social charges in respect of low-paid employees in consideration for

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Yves Chérot, Three French Courts acknowledged State’s liability towards aid recipients for not having granted un-notified State aid (Kélian, Fontanille, Salmon Arc-en-ciel), 15 October 2003, e-Competitions Bulletin October 2003, Art. N° 13362

Visites 4103

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues