Frances M. Murphy

Morgan Lewis (London), Morgan Lewis (Brussels)
Lawyer (Partner)

Frances Murphy has considerable competition law experience representing clients in behavioral and transactional matters across a range of markets. On the behavioral side, her practice focuses on defending leading cartel cases, market sharing and patent settlement arrangements, and alleged abuses of dominant position. As a transactional lawyer, she has considerable experience with mergers and acquisitions, restructurings, joint ventures, and other strategic alliances, as well as with licensing of intellectual property rights. Frances leads the London competition law practice. She has defended clients in the recent European Commission investigations of price-fixing in the aviation and maritime shipping industries. She has participated in sector inquiries by the EU, the UK Competition Commission, and the Office of Fair Trading in the grocery, insurance, pharmaceuticals, and construction sectors. On the transactional side, she has represented AstraZeneca Plc, Crompton (now Chemtura), Inmarsat, Interoute Communications, and Persimmon Plc in acquisitions, joint ventures, and investments. Frances is a Fellow of the Centre for International Legal Studies and a member of the British Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, the Competition Law Forum, the Competition Committee of the International Chamber of Commerce, the European Federation of Pharmaceuticals Association, and the Law Society European Solicitors Group. She is party to a respected think tank on the European Commission on EU Competition Law and legislative change. She is a contributing editor of the State Regulation section of one of the leading U.K. competition law textbooks. Frances is identified as a leading competition lawyer by Chambers, Legal 500, and PLC Which lawyer?

Linked authors

4-5 Gray’s Inn Square
Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft (Brussels)
Jones Day (London)
Squire Patton Boggs (London)
Jones Day (London)
London School of Economics
Jones Day (London)
Jones Day (London)

Articles

10008 Bulletin

Frances M. Murphy, Francesco Liberatore, Marguerite Lavedan The EU Commission signs an agreement with the Swiss Competition Commission to strengthen cooperation between them and enable the exchange of information on antitrust matters

39

The European Commission (EC) and the Swiss Competition Commission (SCC) have signed an agreement to strengthen cooperation between them and enable the exchange of information on antitrust matters. The agreement will enter into force once it has been approved by the European Parliament and the (...)

Frances M. Murphy, Francesco Liberatore, Lynette Zahn The UK OFT publishes updated guidelines on its decisionmaking processes, in preparation for a wider reform of the UK competition law regime

33

The UK Office of Fair Trading ("OFT") has published updated guidelines on its decisionmaking processes, in preparation for a wider reform of the UK competition law regime. The goals of the OFT’s revised procedures are quicker and fairer decisions by the OFT in enforcing UK and EU antitrust (...)

Frances M. Murphy, Francesco Liberatore The EU General Court confirms that leniency documents produced under the Commission’s leniency program are not exempt from disclosure in civil actions (Energie Baden-Württemberg)

235

A recent ruling from the EU General Court ("General Court") in EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG v Commission confirms that leniency documents produced under the European Commission’s ("Commission") leniency program are not exempt from disclosure in civil actions in the EU. Earlier this year, the (...)

Frances M. Murphy, Francesco Liberatore The EU Court of Justice rules that EU law does not exempt leniency documents lodged with national competition agencies from requests for disclosure in private actions (Pfleiderer)

83

On 14 June 2011, the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled that EU law does not exempt leniency documents lodged with national competition agencies ("NCAs") from requests for disclosure in private actions. In a reference for preliminary ruling from a German court, Pfleiderer v (...)

Frances M. Murphy, Matt Evans, Stephen Brown, Tom Bainbridge The UK Court of Appeal holds that the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal has no discretion to extend limitations period for follow-on actions against alleged cartelists (BCL, BASF)

1049

On 12 November 2010, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales ruled that the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) does not have discretion to extend the time period within which follow-on actions for damages may be commenced. The Court of Appeal’s judgment provides important clarification of (...)

Frances M. Murphy, Matt Evans, Stephen Brown The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal clarifies timing rules for follow-on private antitrust actions for damages against cartel participants (BCL, BASF)

575

On 19 November 2009, the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”) confirmed the test it will apply when assessing whether to extend the time limit by which claimants may commence follow-on actions for damages before the CAT once there has been a finding of a breach of UK or EU competition law. The (...)

Frances M. Murphy, Matt Evans The EU Commission fines cartellists in a plastic additives sector highlighting the risk of "facilitating" cartel participation (AC-Treuhand)

1171

On 11 November 2009, the European Commission (the « Commission ») fined 24 companies a total of € 173 million for operating cartel arrangements in the plastic additive sector. The companies fixed prices, shared customers, allocated markets, and exchanged sensitive commercial information for tin (...)

Frances M. Murphy, Tom Bainbridge The European Court of Justice reverses the Commission decision regarding the legality of dual pricing arrangments between leading pharmaceutical undertaking and Spanish wholesalers (GlaxoSmithKline)

1942

On 6 October 2009, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued its judgment in the long-running wrangle regarding the legality of GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK) dual pricing arrangements with Spanish pharmaceutical wholesalers. As a result of the judgment, the European Commission (Commission) will have (...)

Send a message